Registry/Tags/#compliance-violation
Classification Tag

#compliance-violation

The agent's actions violated legal, regulatory, or policy requirements.

6
Cases
0
APM-0049·Other / Unknown·MODERATE·~$193k
Jun 10, 2026

FTC fined 'robot lawyer' DoNotPay $193,000 over unproven AI legal-service claims

The FTC charged in September 2024 that DoNotPay marketed an 'AI lawyer' as a substitute for human attorneys without testing whether it performed at a lawyer's level or employing lawyers to verify quality, and that a feature claiming to scan small-business sites for legal violations was ineffective. DoNotPay settled for $193,000, agreed to notify 2021–2023 subscribers, and was barred from unsubstantiated 'robot lawyer' claims (final order January 2025).

0
APM-0039·Azure OpenAI·MODERATE
Jun 10, 2026

New York City's official 'MyCity' business chatbot told entrepreneurs they could break the law

NYC's MyCity chatbot, launched October 2023 to help business owners, was found by The Markup (March 2024) to give dangerously inaccurate legal guidance — telling users that landlords could refuse Section 8 voucher holders, that employers could take a cut of workers' tips, and that there were no limits on residential rent, all illegal under NYC/NY law. The city initially kept the bot online with a disclaimer; it was ultimately taken down.

0
APM-0040·OpenAI·MODERATE·~$5k
Jun 10, 2026

Lawyers sanctioned after ChatGPT fabricated six fake case citations in Mata v. Avianca

In a personal-injury suit against Avianca, attorney Steven Schwartz used ChatGPT for research and submitted a brief citing six judicial decisions that did not exist — ChatGPT invented them and even 'confirmed' they were real when asked. U.S. District Judge Castel sanctioned Schwartz and co-counsel Peter LoDuca $5,000 and required corrective letters. It became the landmark cautionary tale about AI hallucination in legal filings.

0
APM-0045·Other / Unknown·SEVERE·~$365k
Jun 10, 2026

iTutorGroup's AI hiring software auto-rejected 200+ older applicants; EEOC settled for $365,000

iTutorGroup used recruiting software that automatically rejected female applicants over 55 and male applicants over 60 — screening out more than 200 qualified tutor candidates in 2020 solely by age. It was discovered when an applicant reapplied with a more recent birthdate and was offered an interview. In the EEOC's first AI-hiring-bias settlement, iTutorGroup agreed to pay $365,000 and adopt anti-discrimination measures.

0
APM-0041·Other / Unknown·CRITICAL·~$1.5M
Jun 10, 2026

Cruise robotaxi dragged a pedestrian ~20 feet in San Francisco; permits suspended and $1.5M federal penalty

On October 2, 2023, a Cruise driverless Chevy Bolt struck a pedestrian who had first been hit by a human-driven car, then executed a pullover maneuver while she was pinned underneath, dragging her about 20 feet at ~7 mph. California's DMV and CPUC suspended Cruise's driverless permits and Cruise pulled its fleet nationwide. NHTSA later imposed a $1.5M penalty for failing to properly report the crash; Cruise also paid $500K over a false report.

0
APM-0055·Other / Unknown·MODERATE
Jun 10, 2026

Amazon scrapped a secret AI recruiting tool that learned to penalize résumés from women

Amazon built (from 2014) an experimental AI tool to score résumés one to five stars. Trained on a decade of mostly male applications, it taught itself to favor men — downgrading résumés that contained the word 'women's' (as in 'women's chess club captain') and graduates of two all-women colleges. Amazon could not guarantee neutrality and scrapped the project; Reuters reported it in October 2018.