Registry/APM-0049
Case No.
APM-0049
Filed
June 10, 2026
Severity
3 / 5 · MODERATE

FTC fined 'robot lawyer' DoNotPay $193,000 over unproven AI legal-service claims

Est. Damage ~$193k
Attribution Anonymous

Independent project · aggregated from public reports and may be unverified — see the primary source below · not affiliated with or endorsed by any company or product named.

The FTC charged in September 2024 that DoNotPay marketed an 'AI lawyer' as a substitute for human attorneys without testing whether it performed at a lawyer's level or employing lawyers to verify quality, and that a feature claiming to scan small-business sites for legal violations was ineffective. DoNotPay settled for $193,000, agreed to notify 2021–2023 subscribers, and was barred from unsubstantiated 'robot lawyer' claims (final order January 2025).

Verified Facts

  • The FTC charged DoNotPay in Sept 2024 over its 'AI lawyer' claims
  • The company did not test against human-lawyer performance
  • Settlement: $193,000 plus subscriber notices; final order Jan 2025

Operational Lessons

  • Don't overstate AI capabilities in regulated domains
  • Substantiate performance claims with evidence
FTC Finalizes Order with DoNotPay Over Deceptive 'AI Lawyer' Claims (FTC)ftc.gov
Discussion
More Cases
0
APM-0039·Azure OpenAI·MODERATE
Jun 10, 2026

New York City's official 'MyCity' business chatbot told entrepreneurs they could break the law

NYC's MyCity chatbot, launched October 2023 to help business owners, was found by The Markup (March 2024) to give dangerously inaccurate legal guidance — telling users that landlords could refuse Section 8 voucher holders, that employers could take a cut of workers' tips, and that there were no limits on residential rent, all illegal under NYC/NY law. The city initially kept the bot online with a disclaimer; it was ultimately taken down.

0
APM-0040·OpenAI·MODERATE·~$5k
Jun 10, 2026

Lawyers sanctioned after ChatGPT fabricated six fake case citations in Mata v. Avianca

In a personal-injury suit against Avianca, attorney Steven Schwartz used ChatGPT for research and submitted a brief citing six judicial decisions that did not exist — ChatGPT invented them and even 'confirmed' they were real when asked. U.S. District Judge Castel sanctioned Schwartz and co-counsel Peter LoDuca $5,000 and required corrective letters. It became the landmark cautionary tale about AI hallucination in legal filings.

0
APM-0046·Other / Unknown·LOW
Jun 10, 2026

Sports Illustrated published product reviews under fake AI-generated authors with AI headshots

Futurism reported in November 2023 that Sports Illustrated published product-review content under fabricated author personas — for example 'Drew Ortiz,' whose headshot was bought from an AI-portrait site and who had no real existence — supplied by third-party vendor AdVon Commerce. After inquiries, the fake authors vanished from the site. Publisher The Arena Group denied the articles themselves were AI-written but acknowledged pseudonyms; the episode damaged SI's credibility.