Skip to content
Registry/APM-0057
APM-00575CRITICALReported February 8, 2023

Google's Bard gave a wrong answer about the James Webb telescope in its first demo, and Alphabet lost about $100B in market value

Agent Involved
Gemini
Estimated Damage
Not quantified
Severity
5 / 5 Catastrophic
Impact Band
Catastrophic failure. Permanent data loss, major security breach, six-figure damages, or legal exposure.

Independent project · aggregated from public reports and may be unverified — see the primary source below · not affiliated with or endorsed by any company or product named.

Prompt

What new discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9 year old about?

In February 2023, Google's promotional demo of its Bard chatbot answered that the James Webb Space Telescope 'took the very first pictures of a planet outside of our own solar system.' The first exoplanet image was actually captured by the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in 2004. The error was spotted immediately, and Alphabet shares fell about 7.7% the next day, wiping roughly $100 billion off its market value during a tense moment in the AI race with ChatGPT.

Verified Facts

  • Bard's launch demo claimed JWST took the first image of an exoplanet
  • The first exoplanet image was actually taken in 2004 by the ESO Very Large Telescope
  • Alphabet shares fell about 7.7%, cutting roughly $100 billion in market value

Not Publicly Confirmed

  • Whether the demo answer was cherry-picked or a live generation

Operational Lessons

  • Verify every factual claim in a high-stakes AI product demo
  • A single confident hallucination can carry large reputational and market cost
Google shares lose $100 billion after company's AI chatbot makes an error during demo (CNN)cnn.com
Case No.
APM-0057
Reported
February 8, 2023
Attribution
Anonymous
Discussion

More Cases

0
APM-0046Other / Unknown2LOW
Nov 27, 2023

Sports Illustrated published product reviews under fake AI-generated authors with AI headshots

Futurism reported in November 2023 that Sports Illustrated published product-review content under fabricated author personas — for example 'Drew Ortiz,' whose headshot was bought from an AI-portrait site and who had no real existence — supplied by third-party vendor AdVon Commerce. After inquiries, the fake authors vanished from the site. Publisher The Arena Group denied the articles themselves were AI-written but acknowledged pseudonyms; the episode damaged SI's credibility.

0
APM-0039Azure OpenAI3MODERATE
Mar 29, 2024

New York City's official 'MyCity' business chatbot told entrepreneurs they could break the law

NYC's MyCity chatbot, launched October 2023 to help business owners, was found by The Markup (March 2024) to give dangerously inaccurate legal guidance — telling users that landlords could refuse Section 8 voucher holders, that employers could take a cut of workers' tips, and that there were no limits on residential rent, all illegal under NYC/NY law. The city initially kept the bot online with a disclaimer; it was ultimately taken down.

0
APM-0090Other / Unknown4SEVERE
Jun 10, 2026

Mississippi federal judge removed all four lawyers from a case after both sides filed AI-hallucinated citations

In the contract dispute between Tom Withers III and the City of Aberdeen, both legal teams filed briefs containing fabricated legal citations produced by generative AI. On 8 June 2026 US District Judge Sharion Aycock of the Northern District of Mississippi issued a sanction order finding Rule 11 violations and removed all four attorneys from the case: Kathleen Wilson, Shauncey Hunter Ridgeway, Mark McClinton and Kathryn Young Williams. Two of them, Ridgeway and McClinton, were barred from appearing before Northern District of Mississippi courts for two years. Judge Aycock wrote that their practice of blindly relying on technology resulted in the hallucinatory citations in their filings, and at a January 2026 hearing attorney Kathleen Wilson testified she did not know AI could hallucinate sources.