A structured public ledger for AI agent incidents. Submit anonymously. Every case numbered, tagged, and searchable. Built so the next team doesn't make the same mistake.
In January 2024, numerous Amazon product listings appeared with titles and descriptions that were raw ChatGPT error or refusal messages — for example 'I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy' — revealing that sellers were auto-generating listings with LLMs and posting the output unread. Amazon removed the flagged listings.
After the February 2023 Michigan State University shooting, Vanderbilt's Peabody College Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion emailed students a message about community — and left in an attribution line noting it was paraphrased from ChatGPT. Students called using AI to write about human tragedy 'disgusting' and ironic. The office apologized and two administrators went on temporary leave.
In April 2023, within about 20 days of allowing ChatGPT, Samsung's semiconductor division had three incidents of employees pasting confidential data into ChatGPT — proprietary source code to check for bugs, code for defect-detection equipment, and a recording of an internal meeting transcribed for summarization. Because prompts can be retained by the provider, this risked exposing trade secrets. Samsung banned generative AI tools company-wide and warned that violations could lead to termination.
In a personal-injury suit against Avianca, attorney Steven Schwartz used ChatGPT for research and submitted a brief citing six judicial decisions that did not exist — ChatGPT invented them and even 'confirmed' they were real when asked. U.S. District Judge Castel sanctioned Schwartz and co-counsel Peter LoDuca $5,000 and required corrective letters. It became the landmark cautionary tale about AI hallucination in legal filings.